I can’t run the repair yet because the **Raw article (P2 output)** field is empty. There is no HTML to validate, and I won’t write the article from scratch because that would be a rewrite, which this layer is not allowed to do.

Senaste artiklar

Please paste the P2 article HTML and I’ll run Gates 1–14 and the intro, language, and JSON-LD checks. Also give me today’s ISO date, since Gate 7 needs it for `datePublished` and `dateModified`.

The research package has problems that will affect the repair, so you may want to fix them upstream first:

1. **Contract claims with no source in the research.** The `must_cover_claims` ask for a 599 kr annual price (the research only mentions it as a SERP figure, not a sourced fact), Konsumentverket guidance, and the copyright law (1960:729). None of these appear in the research facts. Gate 3 would downgrade them to rumor-list.

2. **Invented-looking quotes.** `quotes_sources_plan` lists a Konsumentverket press officer, a copyright lawyer, and an independent tech journalist. None of them appear in the research. The only quotable statements come from publications and anonymous ”Redaktionen” writers. I can’t attribute quotes to the planned speakers without fabricating them. Gate 9 can be met with the quotable statements from Samhällsbevakning, Riksfokus, Guru99, Nordisc IPTV, and Bästa IPTV test, as long as those publications are named.

3. **Tested-provider count.** The stats line ”Vi testade 5 leverantörer” would make the site look like it ran its own test. The research shows only third-party counts (3, 5, 8, 10, 12, 31). The line has to be labeled as a SERP claim, or dropped.

4. **Price conflicts.** Nordic IPTV is 89 kr/mån in the comparisons, while Nordisc IPTV is 179 kr/mån in the facts. Monster IPTV ”från 83 kr” appears only in a comparison with no matching fact. The Viking IPTV ”12 månader till 660 kr/mån” figure looks like a unit error and should be checked against the source video.

5. **Source naming.** The research uses both ”Nordstream” and ”Nordic Stream”, and the Guru99 ”2026-11-06” date is attached to two different URLs.

6. **Internal links fail relevance.** Both suggested anchors are about woks and sleep masks. Gate 6 and the `internal_link_relevance_required` check will reject them, so you’ll need topical links or none.

7. **Research gates not met.** The research marks `min_unique_sources_18`, `tier_1_2_share_min_60pct`, and `research_confidence: low` as failing. Under Gate 10, rumor-list must be at least as long as confirmed-list.

Send the article and today’s date, and I’ll return the repaired HTML.